Commons:Administratorzy
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
|
Administratorzy in other languages: |
Uprawnienia administratora przyznawane są znanym i zaufanym członkom społeczności, którzy znają politykę Commons. Uprawnienia administratora nie mają sugerować kontroli edytorskiej nad projektem.
Obecnie sysopami są:
| Administrators as of November 2008 [+/-] |
| Listing by language Listing by date |
|
Sysopami posługującymi się językiem polskim są:
Administrator to po prostu zaufany użytkownik, który może:
- zabezpieczać i odbezpieczać strony
- usuwać i przywracać strony
- usuwać grafiki i inne przesłane pliki
- blokować i odblokowywać użytkowników
- edytować wygląd interfejsu i innych zabezpieczonych stron
Możesz poprosić o przyznanie uprawnień administratora na Commons jeśli spełniasz poniższe kryteria:
- Nie jesteś zupełnie nowy w projektach Wikimedia. Jesteś użytkownikiem od co najmniej 2 miesięcy oraz rozumiesz i zgadzasz się z celami projektu
- Posiadasz stronę użytkownika na Commons i jesteś aktywnym (dodającym i modyfikującym zawartość projektu) użytkownikiem
- Zgadzasz się przestrzegać ważnych polityk i respektować ustalenia zawarte przez użytkowników Commons
- Użytkownicy projektu zgodzą się przyznanie ci uprawnień administratora
Zgodnie z polityką uprawnień administratorskich na Meta, nieaktywni administratorzy mogą zostać pozbawieni praw.
[edit] Requests for adminship
Create a subpage Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/Username with the following text:
==[[User:Username|Username]]==
{{custom edit|Template:Administrators/Requests and votes/Username|text='''Vote'''}}
Reasons why you think you should be an admin. ~~~~
===Votes===
and list it on Administrators/Requests and votes.
[edit] Requests for Adminship
[edit] Diti
Links for Diti: Diti (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · blocklog)
I usually see people being nominated here, but I am attempting to request an adminship for my own again, having been asked to try again in a couple of weeks; 5 months later, I think I can try again. I am an active contributor at fr.wikipedia (editcount), and besides the activity I have at Commons (categorization, tagging for deletion, translations), I sometimes need [someone] to perform administrative tasks on Commons.
People at fr.wikipedia know me well and probably think this nomination is a good idea. But for people who not know me and/or think the contrib lists aren't sufficient enough to give them an opinion about me, I would advise them not to hesitate to ask questions before voting, if they want to see if this status is suitable for my behavior, points of view, and such.
Here are some interesting things about me:
- I can spot problematic licensing ;
- If you want to see how I react to a (small, kind of) conflict: Template talk:Pink CC (please note that I will ask Samuel Blanc to send an OTRS permission once he's back, to make sure) ;
- I watch on a daily basis, and participate to the FP candidates ;
- I watch on a daily basis the deletion requests, but since I can't receive e-mails from Commons about them, it's when I think about it that I contribute ;
- I tend to prefer interventions on Commons: and Template: namespaces; I prefer dialog rather than acts to fix problems (ie I know that, on DR, the thing that does matter is the arguments, not the number of votes) ;
- My last (I know how to react now, and that my motivation text for deletion wasn't right) illustration of WP:POINT on a deletion request.
I have read and understand fully the project scope (which I am currently translating, nicely helped by Korrigan when I don't have time —thanks a lot to him—). I have read this section and know what being a sysop here does imply.
Well, I think don't have any other important thing to say, good or bad, about me. Please note that this is a second nomination: first is located here: Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/Diti. If you are interested, here is my editcount for Commons.
Cheers,
Diti (talk to the penguin) 12:39, 16 November 2008 (UTC) — Also, please note that I am very often contactable on #wikimedia-commons.
[edit] Votes
Support --Garfieldairlines (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Support trustworthy user. Elfix (talk) 12:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Support the right man at the right place ! --Theoliane (talk) 12:51, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
SupportEugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 16 November 2008 (UTC)- weak
Support abf /talk to me/ 16:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
За --Anatoliy (talk) 17:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Pour looks trustworthy. Darkoneko (talk) 18:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)- Support: trustworthy user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support: ok for me too --GdGourou - °o° - Talk to me 18:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Support. No real issues I can see & the help would be good, merci --Herby talk thyme 18:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Although the support of french-speaking IRC users who are only very occasional contributors on Commons is quite pathetic, the help of Diti could be useful.--Bapti ✉ 18:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- It may be true, but there is many issues of copyvio articles created on fr with the related copyvio images... uploaded into commons. We definitly need more avalaible french speaking people to speedy-delete this kind of thing. DarkoNeko 23:07, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
For Diti addressed the issues in the previous RfA. I'm glad they're taking their time to read through FOP. Also I'm glad that Diti can accept that we all can make mistakes at times. --Kanonkas(talk) 21:07, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Support No reason not to.--Paloma Walker (talk) 01:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Support No problem : I trust this user. Pymouss Tchatcher - 12:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Of course!!! I have faith in his abilities. Jacopo Werther (talk) 19:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Pour. WJBscribe (talk) 02:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Samþykkt, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Comments
Question: what would you do if somebody uploaded this image here? Also explain why you would do it. --Kanonkas(talk) 17:09, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, the image seems suitable for Commons, since the Creative Commons license applying to it is CC-by. Just to make sure, I usually quickly look at:
- The photo at full size, to see whether this is a repost or an original work;
- The other photos from the uploader at Flickr.
- Here, the subject has been photographed by the person at Flickr, his photos are usually “All rights reserved” if identifiable people appear, but as it's not, he has put them under CC-by. So, as long as the correct source, author and license information are given, I wouldn't delete it.
- I must add that, if a similar monument had been photographed in France, I would have (even as a sysop, to have the community consensus) requested its deletion, because Freedom of panorama isn't allowed over there.
- (Interesting monument, by the way) Diti (talk to the penguin) 17:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Wrong answer, you might want to take a look at COM:FOP. --Kanonkas(talk) 19:16, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Impressive test… I have to admit that I have watched the page in the past but I've been only interested in the France section, living here and knowing that I'd have issues with it in the future. It's definitely a page I have to read completely, or at least looking at it before closing a RfD. Thanks, I have learned of this. :) Diti (talk to the penguin) 20:03, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Question: Regarding to the Crown Fountain, I saw that this image had been formerly requested for deletion. Another contributor uploaded a non-copyrighted version… but what about the copyrighted version in file history? Unlike Wikipedia, I thought we cannot purge copyvios (but I've been told on IRC that we can), so… I'm pretty sure it has to be deleted and reuploaded (keeping the file history, though)someone has to delete this. Am I right? I just wanted to make sure. Diti (talk to the penguin) 22:01, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Wrong answer, you might want to take a look at COM:FOP. --Kanonkas(talk) 19:16, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Request for removal of rights
- You can request removal of your rights at m:Steward requests/Permissions.
[edit] Requests for Bureaucratship
- None currently
[edit] Requests for CheckUser
Please note that for a request to succeed in this section a minimum of 25 support votes and an 80% positive vote are required in accordance with Meta policy. Note also that in accordance with recent practice, requests for CheckUser will run for 2 weeks.
- None currently
[edit] Request for Oversight Rights
Page revisions can be Oversighted, so that they no longer appear in page history, and can only be restored by developers, although they can be seen in source form by those with the oversight permission while they remain in the oversight log. The right is used to remove material that may give rise to legal challenges or to remove offensive or attack based material from view, especially when concerning a person's real life identity, full name, address, telephone number etc. Note: As with Checkuser, a wiki must have at least 2 "Oversighters" for accountability and to serve as checks and balances. 25 votes in support, and at least 80% positive votes overall are required to grant the right. Note also that in accordance with recent practice, requests for Oversight will run for 2 weeks.
- None currently
[edit] Requests for Bot Flags
[edit] NiavBot
Operator: — Delhovlyn (discuter / talk)
Automatic or Manually Assisted: It depends on the task. More likely
Programming Language(s): Sometimes Pywikipedia framework, sometimes AutoWikiBrowser.
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): one time run
Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Y
Functions: The main reason for asking the bot flag is to clean pages from this list. (This is a bug caused by the Wikimedia Commonplace freeware, who adds sometimes a bad third parameter to {{self}}, causing things like this : [1]. I posted a bug report and I'm waiting for a response since July.) This is a task very simple, but repetitive, that's why I need bot flag. See Special:Contributions/NiavBot for edits I made. This bot could be useful to me for other tasks, like template replacement, or anyhting else.
Note: fr:User:NiavBot has bot flag on fr.wikipedia [2].
— Delhovlyn (discuter / talk) 17:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Bot contributions look OK for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Privatemusings notabot bot
Operator: Privatemusings (talk)
This is not really a bot, I guess, but I would like to be able to use Commonist to upload large sets of images, initially from The Powerhouse Museum (Wiki article on the museum).
In terms of 'permissions', I'd like to be able to upload any large sets of images which are clearly and uncontroversially beneficial to the project (ie. 'copyleft' collections from other large, well established cultural institutions as they may become available).
Thanks! - and I'm (obviously) happy to talk about the best ways to get these awesome images onto Commons :-) Privatemusings (talk) 21:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Automatic or Manually Assisted: per 'Commonist' interface
Programming Language(s): none Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Once in a while - will happily take advice on 'good times', if any....
Bot flag requested: (Y/N):
Functions: Upload sets of images.
[edit] Discussion
I would like to do a test run, and await confirmation that this would be a good idea :-) - further, I should highlight this application for me to become a 'flickr reviewer' which, if possible, and if granted, I would also like conferred upon this account? - The intention is to facilitate smooth uploading of lots of great images :-) cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 21:37, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- You dont need a botflag for uploading large amounts of images. Just upload them. We do have several bots to easily move images from flickr to Commons. I like flickr2commons, but you can find more tools at Commons:Tools#Upload_media. Multichill (talk) 22:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hi multi - in my recent first attempt (really just getting to know 'commonist' a bit), I think my contributions tended to 'flood' the recent changes page a bit? I guess I can see why the uploading of hundreds (and ultimately thousands) of images, particularly when being achieved through one click 'select all' and 'upload', might be the sort of activity for which a bot flag is a good idea... equally I'm happy to 'just do it'! (but will hold of a little pending further discussion... cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 22:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- If you're only going to do that once in a while I wouldn't worry about it, personally - it's when you plan to flood RC on a regular basis that we look at bot flags. I say just do it! Giggy (talk) 11:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Do we know how many images will be uploaded? — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 15:12, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Could be about a thousand, all up - and I'm having some luck in finding more leads. Obviously I'm open to advice about how best to spread the uploads / not disturb the site's smooth running in general. cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 05:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- okey dokey - so I've done about 200 now as a 'first run' (this has been one of the most fun things I've ever gotten around to doing on wiki! - go add one image to a wiki article!) - I don't think anything broke too badly, and welcome feedback for improvements to my methodology :-) cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 07:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Could be about a thousand, all up - and I'm having some luck in finding more leads. Obviously I'm open to advice about how best to spread the uploads / not disturb the site's smooth running in general. cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 05:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hi multi - in my recent first attempt (really just getting to know 'commonist' a bit), I think my contributions tended to 'flood' the recent changes page a bit? I guess I can see why the uploading of hundreds (and ultimately thousands) of images, particularly when being achieved through one click 'select all' and 'upload', might be the sort of activity for which a bot flag is a good idea... equally I'm happy to 'just do it'! (but will hold of a little pending further discussion... cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 22:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 555.bot
To prevent new floods of uploads on my main user account, I would like to get a bot flag in this account. It's only purpose is to mass upload .png public domain book scans taken from various sources (Google Book Search, National Library of Brazil, National Library of Portugal etc) in order to play within ProofreadPage extension on Wikisource.
Q/A:
- What are your past uploads floods?
- Category:Noções Elementares de Archeologia → s:pt:Noções Elementares de Archeologia/I (still needing categorization by subject and incomplete on Wikisource :( ): 300 files
- Category:Carta a el-rei D. Manuel sobre o achamento do Brasil: 28 files
- Category:Os Lusíadas: 376 files
- Category:Peregrinaçam: 46 files (the category have 48 files, but two aren't uploaded by me due to some obscure bugs)
- Why not single uploading in one .djvu file?
-
- Sometimes I need to split a larger file into small djvu files due to the 20Mb issue, like I've done at Category:Peregrinaçam: instead of uploading one ~130Mb .djvu converted from the 42Mb PDF, I uploaded the files using the splitted PDF files converted in djvu;
- .djvu conversion is lossy. Books from Google Book Search downloaded as a .pdf and converted to .djvu generates a small and low-quality file. But using the Adobe Acrobat 8 Professional I get a few dozens of high-quality (600 dpi) .png files. It will be useful to crop images from the texts sets.
-
I will be using the commonist to mass upload the files. Lugusto • ※ 20:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Could you please make a test run? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Done: I've uploaded the first 30 pages from a book of 148 pages (but MediaWiki don't render then =( ). Lugusto • ※ 02:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Looks OK for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- The categories are incorrect, please fix it. Multichill (talk) 22:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Looks OK for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nuked the .pngs, replacing by .jpgs files (I hope that MediaWiki now supports it). Please re-check.
- @Multichill: the category is the name of the book. This is done like as in Category:Scanned English texts (the fully categorization is done only at the category that have the book name). Please let me known if you have any suggestions of different category schemas.
- Lugusto • ※ 19:00, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Category:Os Sambaquis de São Paulo is just fine (the first uploads contained a non-existant category). It would be nice if you included a {{BookNaviBar}}. Multichill (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] John Bot II
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic
Programming Language(s): Python
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Daily
Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Bot has flag.
Functions: The images will be first approved by humans using my script. Then they will be moved over to the commons and marked for CSD:I8 here.
The bot will also do tasks such as removing move to commons templates from images that users have tagged, and marking Images that were already moved.
The code will be posted after some finishing touches.
A parallel request is being made at en:Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/John Bot II 3, the code is at en:User:John Bot II/Source Assembla
[edit] Discussion
- Could you please make a test run? What about moved images categorization? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- The images will have the chance to be manually categorized with my tool on en wiki, then will be put through CommonsHelper. If there are still no categories then it will be marked with {{unc}}. I can't do a test run until BAG gives me a trial. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 19:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Approved for trial on enwiki. Mr.Z-man (talk) 02:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- TRIAL IS DONE CWii(Talk|Contribs) 19:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- I think will be good idea to refer to original image page in Source field not just Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Investigating... CWii(Talk|Contribs) 19:36, 24 October 2008 (UTC)- Image:Asia_1300bc.jpg#Original_upload_log The link is in there, I put the images through CommonsHelper for formatting and categories, but can always change/move the link. I'm fixing this. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 19:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Fixed. Approved on Wikipedia. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 18:24, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- Could you please make a new test run? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Fixed. Approved on Wikipedia. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 18:24, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- I think will be good idea to refer to original image page in Source field not just Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- TRIAL IS DONE CWii(Talk|Contribs) 19:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Approved for trial on enwiki. Mr.Z-man (talk) 02:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- The images will have the chance to be manually categorized with my tool on en wiki, then will be put through CommonsHelper. If there are still no categories then it will be marked with {{unc}}. I can't do a test run until BAG gives me a trial. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 19:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
← Sure, I'll move 1 image. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 20:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- 1 image moved, but it's broken somehow on wpen CWii(Talk|Contribs) 20:41, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Done and fixed. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 21:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Looks OK for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- So is there anything else to do or can I start this for real? CWii(Talk|Contribs) 12:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Cwii, just figured something out. The lists for the filters have to be initialized (forgot about that). You have to run imagerecat.initLists() before you can run applyAllFilters. Now the blacklist and the country filter dont work. Multichill (talk) 20:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- So is there anything else to do or can I start this for real? CWii(Talk|Contribs) 12:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Archive
Links to old Requests and votes are archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.